coloradoan-anti-censorship.net

Catwhisperer, When a person told me to Google the name, the first thing to appear was the page from this site. That is what I found to be funny. As the work that Randal did as a CFI in my case, was to ignore the possible sexual abuse of my daughter I found it fitting that this would be the first story to appear about him. Randal also refused to consider the medical evidence that showed two therapists had no idea of what they were talking about when describing abuse of my son. You are correct that he has worked on the defense side of the courts. But Randal's performance was to show the courts that the sexual abuse of children, would and will not prevent Randal from siding with prior errors made the courts. For Randal it is better that children be abused, rather than show the courts he will act on the facts. Randal refused to make one phone call to find the truth. Much like George Hass and Larry Abrahamson are not willing to look at the facts, but would rather rely on those who were investigated and found to have made false statements in a case of sexual abuse of a child. Randal possesses a quality that should not be held by someone who may want to head the Larimer County District Attorney's Office.