coloradoan-anti-censorship.net

I received this e-mail from Larry Abrahamson after leaving a voice message with him, to support his claims that Andrew Lewis, Emily Humphrey and David Vandenberg had evidence to support their claims my mother did not have $35,000 stolen from her.   --- On Thu, 3/3/11, Larry Abrahamson <abrahalr@co.larimer.co.us> wrote:

From: Larry Abrahamson <abrahalr@co.larimer.co.us> Subject: Phone call To: "Gregg Leverett" <greggleverett@yahoo.com> Date: Thursday, March 3, 2011, 2:33 PM Mr. Leverett I received your phone call concerning your wife's case.  There is nothing more we can say that will convince you or change your mind. This case was handled by very capable deputies with advice and direction from other experienced prosecutors.  You will never agree with our decision and that is your prerogative, however we will no longer debate the issue with you.  Your more than 45 emails since November 1 of last year and now phone calls repeat the same complaint with little  variation.  I am sorry you do not agree with our decision but this matter is closed and will receive no further comment.. -- Larry R. Abrahamson District Attorney 201 LaPorte Ave. Ste 200 Fort Collins, CO 80521  

 This is my response to him. Flag this message Re: Phone call (Just asking for some integrity????) Thursday, March 3, 2011 6:21 PM   From: "Gregg Leverett" <greggleverett@yahoo.com> Add sender to Contacts     To: "Larry Abrahamson" <abrahalr@co.larimer.co.us>   Mr. Abrahamson,   It is the fact that you say capable deputies and not competent deputies. Are you saying that they are not competent, only capable. If they are not competent but only capable, the question becomes capable of what???? Are they capable of hiding or ignoring the truth???? Are they capable of providing answers such as you have been doing not to provide evidence to support their claims of competence????? Much like Renee Doak's did in for the exculpatory evidence in the Shoan Luke case????? Much like the failure to have the proper ID of a defendant until after the sentencing phase of a trial????? Much like the use of statements from those your own office has found will make false statements in a sexual abuse case of a child????? Mr. Abrahamson what is so hard to provide me with the evidence that was used by David Vandenberg to determine that he had a true understanding of the 12 year relationship that I had with my ex-wife?????? Mr. Abrahamson what is so hard to provide me with the evidence that my mother did not have $35,000 stolen from her, as you claim in your "Trust Me" letter????? What is so hard to provide to me the evidence that was used to deny me the access to my ex-wife's file when I had a legal right to that information to defend myself in a tort case????? Mr. Abrahamson, why it is so hard to do these simple steps???? Is because you do not have the evidence to support your claims????? Is it because David Vandenberg, Andrew Lewis, and Emily Humphrey performed in a capable manner to withhold these items from me and not perform in a competent manner in this case, and thus to hide this incompetence you are not going to support your claims with evidence because the evidence does not exist. Can David Vandenberg provide the second evaluation that refutes many of the claims made by my ex-wife, and her friends that David Vandenberg may have used in his assessment of the case???? Does that show competence on the part of yourself, Andrew Lewis, Emily Humphrey. and David Vandenberg?????? All I am asking is for of you or the others is to support the claim from your letter that you reviewed everything and found all actions were competent???? Mr. Abrahamson can you do that????? Is it common for the Larimer County Courts to have allowed you this lack of supporting evidence for so long that you have lost the ability to use evidence in your cases?????   Gregg Leverett