coloradoan-anti-censorship.net

With the latest James Broderick court hearing evaporating into thin air, as reported by the Fort Collins Coloradoan below, we have to wonder. No longer is there even a semblance of the justice regular citizens get. An appeal has been filed, on the taxpayer dime, which is likely to last for two years due to case load if nothing else. Broderick is still on salary, on the taxpayer dime. What does Lt. Broderick do to merit being on a salary that most of us would envy in this current economic climate? Does the new Fort Collins Police Chief actually assign Lt. Broderick real police work (wouldn't have a problem then), or is he sitting on his ass at home drawing unjustified pay that NONE of us would get if we were in similar circumstances but not police officers? Will the Colorado Appeals Court expedite the proceedings to save the taxpayer money?

Is anybody adding this up? What is the sum total this is costing the taxpayer in the community. Who could almost buy a new Football Stadium with the amount of money this has cost. And is continuing to cost.

So come the 15^th, when I respond to the summons for the ticket from the Larimer County Workforce Center, you can bet that I'm going to demand the same kind of FULL justice that Mr. Broderick gets to enjoy. I also think

Would I feel safe if I lived in Ft. Collins?

In a word, No.

I don’t trust liars.

When Stacy Lynne was being stalked, threatened and harassed by the biological father of her son she went to the Larimer County Sheriff’s Dept. with multiple forms of evidence.  The case was assigned to Detective Sgt. John Feyen, the “Crimes against Persons” Go to Guy.  Apparently, after meeting with someone in the District Attorney’s office it was decided  the evidence did not meet the burden of proof.

November 15^th Permanent Orders Hearing in Courtroom 3A.  Sgt. John Feyen was being questioned by one Amy Antommaria, Counsel for the biological father.  She asked him questions regarding the complaints of Stacy Lynne against the behavior of the biological father.  It went like this (from the official Court Transcript):

Q: Do you believe that the accusations and the information that was provided to you

But that is what the preliminary hearing is all about, showing that there is enough evidence to bring things to trial. Obviously, there is. Convictions, however, don't occur at preliminary hearings, and those hearings are biased predominantly for the prosecution. There not much defense counsel input into them.

Looking at what was reported on the Coloradoan story quoted below, the most damaging piece of evidence is the watch. How did the watch get to be in the area? I won't get into conjecture on that one point, because that is a crucial piece of evidence. Kind of like homie's broken hand that didn't hit nobody. Some thoughts on everything else though:

• The burns are probably explainable. One possible reason is manufacturing charcoal.
• There's any numerous reasons for having a bandage on the hand.
• Was there clothing with accelerant smell on them or evidence of combustion. Some forensic chemical analysis of clothing similar to what they do when they test for gunshot residue.

With respect to the Coloradoan story quoted below, I can honestly say, from very personal experience, that this is the standard modus operandi in this Eighth Judicial District of Colorado. Stop a second, and step back. Look at the forest, instead of the trees in front of your face.  What year is this? 2012, duh. What is this year? Umm. An election year. Pray tell, who is term limited this year? Head scratching? Yes, well I want y'all to think, deep and well about this because if you DON'T pay attention, you, dear electorate, will be played like a cheap violin, and might I venture to say, yet again.

What my next question would be is: Has Mr. Gilmore given notice that he is taking it to trial or has he refused a plea. When my incident with the Larimer County employee, related in posts below this one, occurred and I responded to criminal charges with a lawsuit against the county employee, they operated in the same fashion.

What is really going on here? What I mention above is hypothesis trying to explain known data. But please recall a certain

Attached below is the testimony of Sargent Feyen, Larimer County Sheriffs Office Investigations Division.

In the Court's order, Judge field claimed that there was no credible evidence presented about jrp's abuse, stalking, harassment and extortion.  This means that Judge field is saying that Sargent John Feyen is a  witness who is not credible. That would be an unusual proposition on the Court's part, one not commonly found in cases of this nature. Is Judge field saying that Sgt. Feyen is lying?

The testimony exchange shows that the sworn statements of Ms. Lynne, thought not acted upon by the DA or law enforcement, where nevertheless not proven false.

Attached below is the first twenty pages of trial transcript. It takes approximately five minutes to read, and reads like a horror script. Transcripts, BTW, are public record.

Let's cut to the chase by starting at line eighteen page four (4.18). What starts there is troubling, but you can't tell unless you're familiar with the law. What's starts there is the Court forcing Ms. Lynne to swear into the record. That, in itself, comes very close to invalidating the proceedings. Where does the Court develop the authority to coerce somebody onto the record before entertaining procedural questions? If you study case law, as in Pacific Reporter, you will find many admonitions against this kind of conduct on the part of the tribunals.

I don't have time to examine this first twenty pages in total. Above was as far as I got today. I'm frying many fish right now, and don't want to burn any of them… But you, reader of this, can read that transcript and start researching the law. Knowledge IS power.

Due to the nature of this issue, and the fact that it is probably going to be ongoing, we're going to create an on-line book on just this topic, now sorted in chronological order. Justice for all in America is one of the guarantees that our nation is based upon. The misconduct here borders on treason to the Constitution. I've been a pro se plaintiff for 20 years, and never have I seen the abuses as occur in the Eighth Judicial District. If you aren't outraged, you haven't been paying attention…

At 9-11 PM, CST, The Common Sense Show starring Dave Hodges and Annie De Riso will be discussing the Stacy Lynne child snatching case. The child snatchers work in the justice system for Larimer County (Ft. Collins, CO).

Tune in tonight via live stream on your computer.  As this is a complicated story, and because none of us wants to believe what the courts are doing to our children this is a very important show to listen to!  The only way this type of thing can happen is because “they” know people do not want to believe such gross injustice exists,  much less that it is often perpetrated by those “in power” while they hide behind the legal system.

The Common Sense Show airs on The Republic Broadcasting Network, Sunday's 9-11pm, Central Time
Live streamed at http://www.republicbroadcasting.org/index.php?cmd=listenlive
Email:     thecommonsenseshow@yahoo.com
Call In Number: 800-313-9443
Phone:  602-620-5582

WHAT ABOUT YOUR RIGHTS & THE RIGHTS OF YOUR CHILDREN, YOUR FAMILY?

A fund has been established to assist Stacy Lynne with legal costs incurred in her 8^th Judicial District child custody (and now) criminal cases. Established by THE BENEFIT OF STACY LYNNE FUND, an unincorporated, non-profit alliance of supporters.

Information: 1-855 Our Rights
Email comments to Go1855OurRights@aol.com
Mail to: The Benefit of Stacy Lynne Fund, PO Box 1211, Arvada, CO 80002-1211

There is now a petition to sign requesting executive intervention by Governor Hickenlooper, available at:
http://www.change.org/petitions/john-hickenlooper-get-stacy-lynne-custody-of-her-child-back

An interesting development in the case of Mr. Benjamin Gilmore. First off, if you don't believe he did it, please join the Facebook account supporting him, http://www.facebook.com/beekeeperjustice.

At first I thought he did, due to the sign he held at one of the Coloradoan photo shoots. But then other things came to light that caused me to change my mind:

• There have been allegations of homeless individuals sleeping in the area where the fire was burned.
• One report stated that a construction worker told the homeless individuals that they could sleep there.
• Homeless individuals were reported as acting suspiciously after the incident at the Occupy Fort Collins gathering.
• One report from Denver has a commentator