Loveland instructor ordered to have no contact with youths

CatWhisperer's picture

Quoted from Coloradoan Story: Loveland instructor ordered to have no contact with youths
Author: Maria Servold ♦ Loveland Connection
Quotation:
A Mountain View High School instructor arrested last week on suspicion of sexual assault on a child cannot have contact with anyone younger than 18 years old, a judge ruled Monday.

Courtney Bowles, a 31-year-old instructional coach at the Loveland high school, is being held at the Larimer County Detention Center on a co-signed $50,000 personal recognizance bond.

She is suspected of sexual assault on a child, sexual assault on a child by one in a position of trust and contributing to the delinquency of a minor, all felonies.

Magistrate Matthew Zehe ordered that Bowles have no contact with the alle-ged 16-year-old victim, his school, his family or anyone younger than the age of 18, including her own children.

"I know this will have a significant impact on Ms. Bowles' ability to see her own children," Zehe said.

The order could be adjusted at a later time to allow her to see her children, Zehe said

Zehe also ordered that Bowles remain 100 yards away from the teen, his home and Mountain View High School, where he is a student.

When asked during the hearing if she had anything to say, Bowles said she was sorry.

According to Bowles' arrest affidavit, she and the 16-year-old boy were naked in a car parked at North Lake Park in Loveland on Friday.

Loveland police officer Sharon Hopkins said in the affidavit that she found the car at 10:41 p.m. and Bowles and the teenager were inside, both naked. They admitted they were having sex.

The teenager initially told Hopkins he was 20 years old, but she determined his real age after inspecting his school ID card, according to the affidavit.

There also was a bottle of vodka in the car, but Bowles said the teen only had a sip, according to the affidavit.

Thompson School District spokesman Wes Fothergill said Bowles is on paid administrative leave until the district can make contact with her.

Bowles works with teachers to improve their ability to teach using new strategies, methods, etc., district officials have said.

The amount of contact instructional coaches have with students varies from coach to coach, Fothergill said.

Bowles was the second Thompson School District employee arrested in the past three months. Johnnie Bellington was arrested in mid-November and remains at the Larimer County Detention Center, facing several charges of sexual assault on a child. He is no longer employed by the district.

When Bellington's lengthy criminal history in the state of Colorado came to light at the start of his case, the Colorado Bureau of Investigations admitted that a faulty or ruined ink-and-paper fingerprint might not have translated to Bellington's digital record, allowing a criminal record search done by the district to be returned clean.

Bowles does not appear to have a criminal record in Colorado. Fothergill said she is the kind of person no one would ever suspect of committing sexual assault crimes.

"If you look at all she's done and her career and work outside the district, this is not someone you'd suspect it would be an issue with at all," he said.

The district has counselors available to all students and participates in the Safe 2 Tell program, which allows students to anonymously post tips or get help in similar situations.

"We don't even want them to feel like something might occur," Fothergill said. "That compromise of the relationship of a student to a teacher is really unacceptable."

Thompson School District notified parents of Bowles' arrest through its phone system, Fothergill said. Kruse Elementary School in Fort Collins, which is near where Bowles lives, also sent an alert to parents of its students.

"The initial investigation suggests this was an isolated incident with no indication of any other victims," the Loveland Police Department said in a release Saturday.

Bowles will be back in court Monday.
---------- CENSORED COMMENT ----------
CatWhisperer wrote:
Replying to Cuda416:

"Zehe ordered that Bowles have no contact .....anyone younger than the age of 18, including her own children".

Her own Children??? Your Honor! You're out of line here. Especially when we blow some sort of smoke saying something about "Presumed innocent until proven guilty" Your Honor. You're part of the system that sickens society when it comes to the system overstepping its boundaries.

So so true. Has she been charged with incest? NO! Has she been charged with abusing her own children? NO!

This is a society of laws where the legal system is out of control because there are no checks and balances on them that police the courts. Yes, she's probably guilty of the charges alleged, but none of those charges have anything to do with her children.

Murderers are allowed to have contact with their children. Crack dealers are allowed to have contact with their children. How is illicit sex with a minor worse than murder or dealing meth or crack?
1/25/2011 6:43:59 AM

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
CatWhisperer's picture

Not really that hard to imagine...

CatWhisperer wrote:
Replying to agfc22:

I cannot imagine what would possess an adult to completely jeopardize their career, standing in the community, and family relationships by doing something like this. Ms. Bowles will pay dearly for the rest of her life for this mistake. She may be 31, but I suspect her emotional maturity is closer to a teenager's, in terms of engaging in very risky (an illegal) behavior w/o apparent regard for the consequences.

Ah, don't you listen to Country music? "What was I thinking", Dierks Bentley. I can totally understand. There's all kinds of possible reasons, from plain monkey lust, to wanting to bust a cherry, to getting sweet talked out of her cloths. Which is it? Nobody but him and her know. Obviously wasn't getting her needs met at home though, IMHO.

Kind of hard to allege lack of complicity on the part of the victim, sporting an ingrown woodie as is wont in those situations, when the Deputies got there...wink
1/25/2011 7:01:59 PM

CatWhisperer
Fort Collins, CO, USA

CatWhisperer's picture

Pre-judged by circumstances, LOL...

CatWhisperer wrote:
Replying to EightFoldPath:

... She was caught NAKED WITH A MINOR. She violated her position as a person of trust, and she should NOT be trusted with a minor. You can't get anymore "caught" than she did, and so she does need to be away from children.

How is the system "overstepping its boundaries?" By protecting children? Do you have kids? Would you like anyone to come into his or her life and have sex with them and nothing happens?

Ok, so she's pre-judged because of the circumstances. Not a problem there, she screwed up. But some of us don't consider a 16 year old a CHILD, and in 1999, it wouldn't have been a crime, so why now?

I'm more worried about the psychological impact to the un-named 16-year old, not of getting a little bit of nookie from an older woman, but from all of the negative media and law enforcement attention. The alleged victim will also be punished, and I'll be willing to bet you that WILL BE A LOT WORSE than the tryst in the park, bad as it is to some.
1/25/2011 6:49:16 PM

CatWhisperer
Fort Collins, CO, USA

Gregg Leverett's picture

DA will say they are tough on crime????

I am sure that the DA will say they being tough on crime. Many know that this order from Zehe, is the first step in the process of the termination of parental rights, and then Linda Connors and DHS can then place the children into foster care, where they will more than likely face real abuse, and then be placed into an adoption program. DHS will get paid for this, and the family will be destroyed. The children may have mental problems that will lead them to commit crimes in the future thus becoming wards of the State forever. Great job, Zehe, you do not deserve to be on the the bench in Larimer County or anywhere else in the country. Many cases like this end up with the children having their lives destroyed all in the name of the best interest of the child, only to destroy the life of the child. Why we as a society continue to support the abuse of our children with this system by those who work in Child Welfare is beyond me. Of course if you talk to the police about this you end up being threatened with arrest. While those like Zehe, enjoy the the protection of law enforcement while they perpetrate their abuse on these kids. The system is totally out of control. What happens to those people employed in this system that fails to protect infants like Summer Moon Hawk? Nothing, they make decisions that result in the deaths of children and when they fail, ask for more funding. I say that the Department of Human Services/Child Welfare get no more increases in funding until they improve their record on keeping children safe.  

Post new comment

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • No HTML tags allowed
  • Non-latin text (e.g., å, ö, 漢) will be converted to US-ASCII equivalents (a, o, ?).

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. The CAPTCHA is case insensitive, and if you can't read the CAPTCHA, please refresh the page. Apologies for any inconvenience.
11 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.