Petition seeks election on medical marijuana centers

CatWhisperer's picture

Quoted from Coloradoan: Petition seeks election on medical marijuana centers
Author: Kevin Duggan
Quotation:
A petition drive aimed at asking Fort Collins voters whether medical marijuana businesses should be allowed in the city has yet to hit the halfway point of its goal for signatures, supporters say.

Petition passers have until July 19 to turn in the signatures of 4,214 registered Fort Collins voters to the City Clerk's Office to advance a proposed ordinance that would ban marijuana businesses, including dispensaries and grow operations, from the city.

If enough signatures are collected, the City Council could enact the ordinance as written or refer it to voters. Supporters of the ban are requesting a special election in November.

Supporters hope to collect at least 6,500 signatures by the deadline because the clerk's office is likely to find many signatures are not valid, said Bob Powell, chairman of the group Concerned Fort Collins Citizens.

Progress on the drive has been slow, with volunteer petitioners running into "a fair amount of apathy," he said. But proponents of the ban believe the presence of medical marijuana businesses in the city is an issue voters should be able to decide.

"We recognize that there are legitimate medicinal uses for marijuana," Powell said. "But is our distribution system such that it produces unintended consequence? That's our concern."

Opposition to the petition drive and the ballot issue, if the matter goes to an election, is being led by the group Citizens for Safer Neighborhoods.

Banning medical marijuana centers would deprive patients of the medicine and professional guidance they need to treat ailments such as chronic pain and muscle spasms, said Terri Gomez, campaign manager for the group.

Patients would have to go to a caregiver who grows marijuana in a home setting to get their medicine or potentially the black market if centers are shut down, she said.

"It would push medical marijuana out of highly regulated and secured centers and into neighborhoods," Gomez said.

Centers offer patients assurances they are receiving a quality product, she said. Commercial facilities can test for mold and pesticides, offer a variety of strains that are effective against specific health problems, and provide delivery methods other than smoking, such as edibles, tinctures and even suppositories.

"You want to know (production) is being done in a licensed, regulated, sanitary condition," she said. "You don't want this happening in someone's kitchen or bathroom."

Colorado voters approved an amendment to the state Constitution in 2000 permitting the use of marijuana to treat qualifying, debilitating medical conditions.

The retail dispensary model for distributing marijuana blossomed about two years ago after the U.S. Department of Justice said the Drug Enforcement Agency would not use its resources against those who follow the state's medical marijuana laws.

State law allows municipalities to ban medical marijuana businesses from their jurisdictions. Loveland, Windsor and Greeley have banned marijuana shops.

Larimer County also has banned marijuana businesses in unincorporated areas, although two centers just outside Fort Collins city limits that started the county's land-use review process before the ban was enacted eventually were approved by the county commissioners.

Several others proposed businesses were not approved by the county, primarily over concerns about neighborhood compatibility.

In Fort Collins, city staff and the City Council went through a long process of establishing regulations for licensing dispensaries and grow operations, including restricting them to commercial and industrial zoning districts. The city has 21 medical marijuana centers, according to the City Clerk's Office.

Critics say Fort Collins is becoming the "weed capital" of Northern Colorado because it allows dispensaries and is sending a message to the city's youths that marijuana use is acceptable and harmless. Marijuana is still illegal under federal law.

Powell said the retail dispensary model leads to an overproduction of marijuana that eventually reaches the black market, making it readily available for recreational users.

Supporters of the petition drive are studying whether the area has seen an increase in illegal marijuana use and production and the possible connection to marijuana businesses, he said.

"That's an unintended harm and something we should talk about as a community," he said.

Steve Ackerman, owner of Organic Alternatives and president of the Northern Colorado Medical Marijuana Business Council, said he doubts the data will support the contention that more marijuana is circulating illegally in the community.

Marijuana grown by dispensaries is monitored by the states and has to be accounted for, he said. The price of marijuana at his shop - between $80 and $90 for a quarter ounce - is higher than prices on the streets, he said.

"There's no profit motive for someone to come in here and buy it from us and sell it to someone else," he said. "There's just no margin."

---------- CENSORED COMMENT FOLLOWS ----------

 

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
CatWhisperer's picture

Look at the signers, you'll understand zarathustra2

CatWhisperer 9:55 AM on June 26, 2011
Replying to zarathustra2 9:29 AM on June 26, 2011

Have these "Concerned Fort Collins Citizens" even bothered to register an issue committee? How did they manage to produce initiative language and print petitions without expenditures or contributions?

Haven't you seen who the signers of the petition initiative are, zarathustra2? Wake up folks! They managed because they have Joshua Ritter, an assistant DA from the Eighth Judicial District as one of the petitioners. I don't know about how they got the petitions printed, I haven't seen any, but it's easy to see how the initiative language was produced.

Name withheld
9:55 AM on June 26, 2011
This comment was left by a user who has been blocked by our staff.

CatWhisperer
Fort Collins, CO, USA

CatWhisperer's picture

Coloradoan shows it's bias not covering MMJ story in earnest...

CatWhisperer 6:57 AM on June 26, 2011
Replying to PcJunkie 6:27 AM on June 26, 2011

I hope this "weeds" out the people that don't really need the drug.

No PCJunkie, it just allows those overly-beautiful people in the 80525 and 80526 zip code to try to dictate to the rest of Fort Collins what they should or shouldn't do. What is the problem, these Medical Marijuana Centers aren't even in your damn neighborhoods. Look at the map, LOL.

And I have a big problem with the Coloradoan. You're reporting selective news. You're not reporting that there has been one legal challenge already to the petition. Why is that not reported? It's not like you haven't been notified, right? Hey, I get it, maybe the ruling by the Court has already occurred, and it's been leaked to you rather than to the litigant that initiated the action. This is the Eighth Judicial District after all, lest we forget. Were the likes of Jolene Blair and Terrence Gilmore were gainfully employed.

It appears that maybe they are having the problem getting the signatures, and therefore FINALLY, the Coloradoan carries the story. What a joke. Sad to see a newspaper being used as a tool...

Be assured, regardless, that if voting occurs any voting outcome that results in the banning of dispensaries will be challenged in the Courts by this patient.

Ray and Justin and the others can't force me to be a farmer, but they may force me and the other 8,500 of us who are patients back to the street. Both Fort Collins and the patients then loose to individuals to whom MMCs are nothing but a political scapegoat.

Name withheld
6:57 AM on June 26, 2011
This comment was left by a user who has been blocked by our staff.

CatWhisperer
Fort Collins, CO, USA

Post new comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. The CAPTCHA is case insensitive, and if you can't read the CAPTCHA, please refresh the page. Apologies for any inconvenience.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.