SAD NEWS TO REPORT ON STACY LYNNE CASE

CatWhisperer's picture

Sadly, I have to bring the news that Stacy Lynne lost the custody of her child via court order from Judge Julie Fields. We had numerous witnesses there to observe the proceedings, but the Court had the deputies wait until almost everybody was gone and run down the street to catch her just as she was driving off. She has been ordered to turn in the child to the Sheriff's Office by noon today, or face an arrest warrant and kidnapping charges. Nasty porcine LCSO Sargent raising his voice to observers in the processes, BTW, caught on video and audio tape by witnesses.

The illegitimacy of this is that AT NO TIME WAS STACY CORRECTLY SERVED WITH THE ORDER IN A MANNER TO ALLOW MEANINGFUL CHALLENGE TO THE ORDER. Of course not, the petitioner is being represented by a member of the Guild, LOL. This is an order from a Court that has refused to look at the evidence that NOT ONE witness, even of the petitioners own witnesses, gave any testimony as to the non-suitability of Stacy Lynne as a parent. Most glowingly spoke of her capability, tenderness, and caring as a mother. Whereas many witnesses spoke of the instability of the father.  The only witness who spoke negatively about Stacy was a one of those court appointed evaluators. And that was before the judge emptied the Courtroom of spectators. What was testified to outside of the view of spectators? Here, despicably, is an example of the local courts using a child as a means of political retaliation against Stacy Lynne for her research and whistle-blowing in local Innosphere fiasco. Folks, that's a story that is almost ready for birth, and this action against Stacy Lynne will precipitate it.

Here's a synopsis of today's occurrences at the Larimer County Justice Center with respect to Stacy Lynne:

  1. Received notiice of Stacy Lynne (SL) orders hearing tomorrow yesterday.
  2. Arrive at Larimer County Justice Center 08:15 hrs.
  3. No SL on docket.
  4. Walked courtrooms looking at the docket sheets. No SL. Did see that there is a Broderick Hearing, Courtroom 5C, 1:30PM.
  5. SL arrives at about 8:40 hrs, about 15 people in tow.
  6. SL is here to get a copy of the orders that she knows were issued but haven't been served on her.
  7. Clerk of 3C tells SL that she needs to go down to file room to get copies of order.
  8. The deputies are getting worried as there is a crowd of us and they don't know our intentions, so I go explain our purpose is to just get a copy of the order. I know most of them quite well from a year at the LCDC…
  9. Fifteen pages of orders (haven't read them yet). She gets copies.
  10. Deputy comes in to remind us of no recording devices. What is up with the Court's irrational fear of recording devices. So that they can attempt to charge us $150/page of transcript or some other ridiculous rights-violating amount?
  11. Deputy stands there to insure that we aren't digitally recording anything.
  12. SL attempts to talk to Larry Abrahamson, but he's not available. She reads out the order to the observers as she waits. No Abrahamson.
  13. Back up to 3A clerk. This time the clerk at the window has a smile on her face. SL comments on her thinking it is funny that she is loosing her child.
  14. SL gives a statement outside, crying. The Court has ordered that she loose parental custody, that the non-present father now get full custody of the child, that she can only have supervised visitations, etc.
  15. I go to leave and get a text that they are blocking her car and preventing her from leaving. WTF!
  16. Go where she is parked across from the County Administration Building. She is being verbally "advised" by the porcine Sargent that she has to turn the kid over to the Sheriff''s Office at the LCSO by noon or face an arrest warrant and kidnapping charges.

So what these individuals did is wait till they thought the witnesses were gone, and then pounced on the "victim". We were there for an hour and a half, physically, at the Larimer County Justice Center in full view of every camera and deputy there. But they couldn't find the time in their busy day to serve the order on her there. No, of course not, but they found the time with the quickness once witnesses were gone. Ridiculous behavior that shows some character flaw, IMHO.

As the author of this post it behooves me to advise the Court:

The Court goes down a dark wrongful path here. WE ARE WATCHING. Nobody alleged anything with SL that would justify parental termination. WE KNOW THE REAL REASON BEHIND THIS. It's related to $5,000,000 of Fort Collins taxpayer money changing hands wrongfully in what was a case of obvious conflict of interest and post-governmental-job padding. When this explodes in your faces, you have nothing and no one to blame but your own corruption, greed, and self-interest and that of the Guild and it's cronies. Also remember that there is no more dangerous and feral animal than a momma critter protecting her babies. Hence, on your heads be it

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Support Stacy Lynne Fund

WHAT ABOUT YOUR RIGHTS & THE RIGHTS OF YOUR CHILDREN, YOUR FAMILY?

A fund has been established to assist Stacy Lynn with legal costs incuurred in her 8th JD child custody (and now) criminal cases. Established by THE BENEFIT OF STACY LYNNE FUND, an unicorporated, nonprofit alliance of supporters.

information: 1-855 Our Rights
email comments to Go1855OurRights@aol.com
mail to: The Benifit of Stacy Lynn Fund, PO Box 1211, Arvada, CO 80002-1211

LarimerWatch

Lord Help Us

Dec 19, 2011 Stacy Lynne went to her child's school at the end of the day to pick up her 8 y/o son. She found him curled in a ball on the floor, next to his estranged father, who had arrived with court papers - ink still wet from Judge Julie Fields. Stacy Lynne received no papers and knew nothing of their contents. She and her son ran from the school building to safety from a man who has threatened both their lives.   Stacy Lynne arrived at the Larimer County Courthouse Dec 20 to find out what was on the papers she didn't have. She discovered in the court file that Judge Fields had issued an order (15 pages), Dec 18, no notice of service included. THIS is how a mother had her child stolen by the state: Stacy Lynne no longer had custody of her son, full custody was granted to the child's father. Stacy Lynne must now have supervised visitation. Stacy Lynne would begin to pay child supoort and attorney fees for her child's father. Ms Lynne searched the entire Justice Center building for help. Chief Judge was unavailable. District Court Administrator not in. Judge Fields' clerk sent her to the file room. Elliot Phelps, DA Investigator was the only person willing to comment to Ms Lynne'. He advised Stacy Lynne to put her complaint and notice of pending legal action against the DA in writing. "What happens to my complaint and claim notice?" she asked. "[b]County attorney will review it." [/b] So the county attorneys defend the DA in legal actions? County attorneys, who influence the DA to prosecute parents for child abuse charges that can't be proven? Double jeopordy of prosecuting someone twice for the same alleged crime that neither office (family civil courts and criminal courts) can prove occured? The same county attorneys who protect caseworkers' unwarranted intrusion into the lives of citizens and remove children without warrants? THOSE COUNTY ATTORNEYS will defend the DA's office for prosecutorial misconduct?
LarimerWatch

Post new comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. The CAPTCHA is case insensitive, and if you can't read the CAPTCHA, please refresh the page. Apologies for any inconvenience.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.